|

Peer Response to Kaede

Kaede’s blog post highlights the intentional thinking behind our blueprint. The way you framed overtrust and the myth of neutrality makes the purpose of the module feel focused and relevant. I especially appreciate how you emphasized that AI literacy goes beyond spotting errors and requires understanding how and why misinformation is produced.

I also enjoyed your explanation of the activity progression. The movement from initial evaluation to deeper analysis and responsible use feels purposeful and well thought out. It reinforces that learners are building both conceptual understanding and practical skills. Your perspective makes the alignment between our learning outcomes, activities, and assessment feel clear and cohesive.

Overall, I really enjoyed reading your post. I noticed a lot of overlap between our blogs, especially around Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and having multiple means of engagement. I am excited to start planning our Interactive Learning Resource together!